![]() “I’m for reuniting young people with their families and their communities, but we need options,” he said.ĭomus was one of those options, he said, acting as a “safety net” that prevented many young people in Stamford from entering the school-to-prison pipeline. ![]() While it’s best for a young person to be in a family setting, he said, many families are flawed and not fully equipped to raise a child. “A one-size-fits-all solution is not for everyone, especially for young people who have been challenged by violence, abuse, neglect, poverty, addiction, and other significant traumas,” she wrote.Ĭharles “Harry” Harris, who worked as a staff member at Domus House for more than 30 years, agrees. In her letter, Wade questioned the state’s tactics. In the past, he said, about one out of every five Connecticut kids in foster care was placed in the home of a relative. That’s why the state has made a more concerted effort over the years to place children with relatives. He said providers like Domus House are dedicated and committed, but nothing is better for children than living in a family setting, either with a foster parent or a relative. ![]() “The consensus is children do better in families,” Kleeblatt said. Today, that figure is 7.6 percent, Kleeblatt said. ![]() In 2011, for example, 30 percent of children in foster care in the state were living in an institutional setting, whether that was a group home like Domus or a residential treatment center. Gary Kleeblatt, spokesperson for the Connecticut Department of Children and Families, said the state has indeed reduced “its reliance on institutional settings for children in foster care.” In it, director of volunteers Julia Wade wrote, “In recent years, Connecticut, along with many other states, discontinued referrals to congregate care programs like Domus House in favor of supporting the foster care framework.” ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |